DRC? Yeah, You Know Me.
By Ethan Marcotte | April 14th, 2004 | Filed in Accessibility
Skip to comment formThe Disability Rights Commission (DRC) released a formal accessibility review of one thousand UK websites today. Their findings paint a bleak picture: in their automated tests, 81% of the sites tested failed to reach the minimum standard for accessibility; additionally, 585 accessibility and usability problems
were uncovered in user testing of a hundred web sites from that group.
However, the study makes specific mention that nearly half of those problems were not in violation of the WCAG checkpoints — implying a shortcoming in the guidelines themselves:
Disability Rights Commission, The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People
Compliance with the Guidelines published by the Web Accessibility Initiative is a necessary but not sufficient condition for ensuring that sites are practically accessible and usable by disabled people.
The W3C promptly issued a response to the DRC‘s findings. While applauding the report and its recommendations as largely useful
and informative
, the statement directly addresses potential misunderstandings about W3C‘s WAI Guidelines introduced by certain interpretations of the [DRC's] data.