http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-73409 Solarmoduel Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:14:58 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-73409 I hope their membership will be a bit cheaper in the future :/ how much do you donate for the validator? greetz from hamburg Peter I hope their membership will be a bit cheaper in the future :/ how much do you donate for the validator? greetz from hamburg Peter

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-73356 Maureen Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:06:10 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-73356 As a web designer/developer, I visit the W3C web site for reference almost daily, whether to check syntax for my web pages or to validate code. I am honored to donate to the project. As a web designer/developer, I visit the W3C web site for reference almost daily, whether to check syntax for my web pages or to validate code. I am honored to donate to the project.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-73187 Angie Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:03:44 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-73187 Thats a good idea to come up with a donation program. I wanted to support them before, but their memberships are way to expensive for me. Thats a good idea to come up with a donation program. I wanted to support them before, but their memberships are way to expensive for me.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-73157 goodwitch Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:50:57 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-73157 Happiness is donating to the W3C validator. Happiness is donating to the W3C validator.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-73136 cleopatra Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:56:41 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-73136 you should check and u ping one of the validators to check your HTML, CSS, or feeds once a weeks atlist you should check and u ping one of the validators to check your HTML, CSS, or feeds once a weeks atlist

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-73114 kblessing Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:41:31 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-73114 As pointed out in the W3C's information, there are other ways to <a href="http://www.w3.org/Status#contribute" rel="nofollow">contribute</a> to the validator program. If you have the expertise to help code or test the validators, you'll be supporting the tools which are probably the most commonly used by developers worldwide. As pointed out in the W3C’s information, there are other ways to contribute to the validator program. If you have the expertise to help code or test the validators, you’ll be supporting the tools which are probably the most commonly used by developers worldwide.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-73012 Andrew Jaswa Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:55:05 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-73012 I'm not sure how I feel about giving to an organization that hasn't been overly transparent about where the money goes. If the W3C wasn't so slow about nearly everything they do, I might consider giving. But as wortwart points out, there are other better services out there. While I would rather use a validator written by the people who write the specifications but if they can't keep up then well too bad for them. Come on W3C get with it. I’m not sure how I feel about giving to an organization that hasn’t been overly transparent about where the money goes. If the W3C wasn’t so slow about nearly everything they do, I might consider giving. But as wortwart points out, there are other better services out there. While I would rather use a validator written by the people who write the specifications but if they can’t keep up then well too bad for them. Come on W3C get with it.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-72946 wortwart Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:47:37 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-72946 I see no point in supporting the W3C HTML validator which has had trouble with XHTML and has been (or still is, I don't know) inaccurate. I rather use Validome.org's service. I see no point in supporting the W3C HTML validator which has had trouble with XHTML and has been (or still is, I don’t know) inaccurate. I rather use Validome.org’s service.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/12/20/support-the-w3c-validators/comment-page-1/#comment-72934 John Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:09:12 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1470#comment-72934 We support W3C and just made a donation to this wonderful program. We hope that all the readers will contribute to this cause in order for the free validators to be available for all. We support W3C and just made a donation to this wonderful program. We hope that all the readers will contribute to this cause in order for the free validators to be available for all.

]]>