Comments on: A band-aid for browsers http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Romina Miersch http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58164 Romina Miersch Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:41:03 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58164 Hello Rafael, I think Ajax is actually a family of technologies that have been available for years. The means to make requests to the server using only JavaScript were built into Internet Explorer 5.5, but the possibilities of the technology were overlooked. The techniques were rediscovered and used, notably to excellent effect… This means that when you send a request, you wait for the response to come back, but are free to do other things while you wait. The response probably won’t come back immediately, so you set up a function that will wait for the response to be sent back by the server, and react to it once that happens. JavaScript is used to make a request to the server. Once the response is returned by the server, you will generally use some more JavaScript to modify the current page’s document object model in some way to show the user that the submission went through successfully. The data that you receive back from the server will often be packaged up as a snippet of XML, so that it can be easily processed with JavaScript. This data can be anything you want, and as long as you want. There’s nothing really new about what is happening here. We’re requesting a file (which will often be a server-side script, coded in something like PHP), and receiving a page as the response. This is how the web works already — the only difference is that now we can make these requests from JavaScript. Hello Rafael, I think Ajax is actually a family of technologies that have been available for years. The means to make requests to the server using only JavaScript were built into Internet Explorer 5.5, but the possibilities of the technology were overlooked. The techniques were rediscovered and used, notably to excellent effect…

This means that when you send a request, you wait for the response to come back, but are free to do other things while you wait. The response probably won’t come back immediately, so you set up a function that will wait for the response to be sent back by the server, and react to it once that happens.

JavaScript is used to make a request to the server. Once the response is returned by the server, you will generally use some more JavaScript to modify the current page’s document object model in some way to show the user that the submission went through successfully.

The data that you receive back from the server will often be packaged up as a snippet of XML, so that it can be easily processed with JavaScript. This data can be anything you want, and as long as you want.

There’s nothing really new about what is happening here. We’re requesting a file (which will often be a server-side script, coded in something like PHP), and receiving a page as the response. This is how the web works already — the only difference is that now we can make these requests from JavaScript.

]]>
By: Rafael http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58153 Rafael Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:57:37 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58153 Javascript respectively Ajax is an absolute must for the Next-Generation Web Application Development. Anyone should thus enable Javascript. That's my opinion! Javascript respectively Ajax is an absolute must for the Next-Generation Web Application Development. Anyone should thus enable Javascript. That’s my opinion!

]]>
By: Erin http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58143 Erin Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:10:47 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58143 I agree with Andy, but there is a development to web 2.0 standard. Java is a simple way to solve problems to build websites. I agree with Andy, but there is a development to web 2.0 standard. Java is a simple way to solve problems to build websites.

]]>
By: Bernd http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58122 Bernd Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:58:45 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58122 I’ am just a rookie in Java-script, but it has a lot of options to use it for websites than people know. I’ am just a rookie in Java-script, but it has a lot of options to use it for websites than people know.

]]>
By: Romina Miersch http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58118 Romina Miersch Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:29:59 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58118 Hallo Mr.Koops... I’ve run into the same thing with marketing agencies who provide web design services. Most I’ve seen tend to concern themselves with how quickly a job can be done and less with the quality of the site altogether, whether in the design or in the code. Many business, whether on the client side or the provider side have a lot to think about when running a business. What I try to get across when talking to people about standards is that it’s really so much simpler than they think, and it can even be much faster than they imagine in the long run to put out the mumbled up messes they were putting out pre-standards. Hallo Mr.Koops… I’ve run into the same thing with marketing agencies who provide web design services. Most I’ve seen tend to concern themselves with how quickly a job can be done and less with the quality of the site altogether, whether in the design or in the code. Many business, whether on the client side or the provider side have a lot to think about when running a business. What I try to get across when talking to people about standards is that it’s really so much simpler than they think, and it can even be much faster than they imagine in the long run to put out the mumbled up messes they were putting out pre-standards.

]]>
By: Andreas Koops http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58115 Andreas Koops Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:10:56 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58115 This is an interesting discussion. I'm a big friend of "In a nutshell, make it small, flexible and standards-based." We have always problems to create an consistent code for all browsers. Where ist the next Band-Aid for browsers? This is an interesting discussion. I’m a big friend of “In a nutshell, make it small, flexible and standards-based.” We have always problems to create an consistent code for all browsers. Where ist the next Band-Aid for browsers?

]]>
By: Ann Climes http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58114 Ann Climes Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:36:00 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58114 Thanks for this really interesting post. It appears really helpful for me. I would like to ask you if I could translate it and include it in our page, also with link to your page. Alternatively I would like to put link to your page on my section with interesting articles. If it would be possible to put this link on my page please email me. One more time thanks for really great article. Greetings Thanks for this really interesting post. It appears really helpful for me. I would like to ask you if I could translate it and include it in our page, also with link to your page. Alternatively I would like to put link to your page on my section with interesting articles. If it would be possible to put this link on my page please email me. One more time thanks for really great article. Greetings

]]>
By: Rolf Beckmann http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58103 Rolf Beckmann Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:18:27 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58103 OK, it depends on the browsers version? But I use the famous browser Opera. How do you think of using this browser. Is there the same problem. Till now I think Opera is the best browser to test websites. OK, it depends on the browsers version?
But I use the famous browser Opera.
How do you think of using this browser.
Is there the same problem. Till now I
think Opera is the best browser to test
websites.

]]>
By: Bramka sms darmowa http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58102 Bramka sms darmowa Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:14:46 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58102 Hello. I use JavaScript to open a pictures in a new popup window, the problem is, spamers use the same of her shit, so many user deactivat JaveScript… Hello. I use JavaScript to open a pictures in a new popup window, the problem is, spamers use the same of her shit, so many user deactivat JaveScript…

]]>
By: Ben Drucker http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-58082 Ben Drucker Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:10:13 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/26/a-band-aid-for-browsers/#comment-58082 Also I rank myself among this majority. My interest lies not in the handling of a Programiersprache separates in the ability to learn of a technology for the publication of contents on my Website. With HTML4 I can begin already very much. But I am grateful and content. Also I rank myself among this majority. My interest lies not in the handling of a Programiersprache separates in the ability to learn of a technology for the publication of contents on my Website. With HTML4 I can begin already very much. But I am grateful and content.

]]>