For those of you who don’t know, the web standards organization (www.webstandards.org) has an acid 2 test that grades a browser’s ability to render the most complicated CSS code.
To answer your question Gary, it does not pass the Acid 2 test.
The test will remain extremely difficult (if not impossible) for Firefox to pass until they upgrade or move beyond the Gecko engine. It’s easier to introduce a form spell checker…
I didn’t download Explorer 7.0, but I’m sincerely doubting it can render the drawing. The Trident engine is absolutely appalling.
Kieran
]]>Are already using Cairo (http://cairographics.org/) for rendering??
]]>– but maybe not terribly effective? Sorry, couldn’t resist.
]]>I am constantly running across misformed email links which leave out the “mailto: portion, and get rendered as URLs.
Logic tells me that if a URL ‘reads’ with the @ symbol in it, that there should be a way to trigger it as a email link vs. a URL website address? By default in the browser programming?
(It would default and detect when the”mailto:” portion of the link is left out if the @ symbol is present.)
This of course assumes the the @ symbol is not used in any actual URL address anywhere
]]>